
Staff cutbacks — not
Posted by Bob HunterWednesday, February 28th, 2007
I had a phone conversation yesterday with a concerned reader/news junkie, who was sure that local media are cutting back their news staffs. Much of her concern seemed to center on reports of layoffs at major metropolitan newspapers and a sense that local TV stations are not covering as much local news as they once did.
I can’t speak for local TV — although one staff member at a local affiliate told me he thought their staff was actually a bit larger than a few years ago. Not a lot larger, but a bit. My caller said one of her concerns was the number of national stories that show up on “local” TV newscasts. I agree with her — it always seems a bit odd and/or jarring to see a national story during the local news: “Rogue Valley news at 11: Family dies in house fire! (in Tennessee.)”
As for us, we have about the same size staff that we’ve had for years — approximately 40 people in the newsroom. We have expanded our reporting capabilities, because we are paying for more freelance reporting than ever before, while maintaining the number of staff reporters.
What that happy news doesn’t reflect is the fact that we are also doing a lot of new things — particularly on the Web — so we do feel stretched in trying the cover all the bases. For us, though, the Web has proven to be a way to add readers and to add them consistently month after month. So the extra effort does pay off with more eyes on our news reports.
Big city papers are having a tough time. Virtually every big city paper has reduced its staff in recent years or months. They’re still reaching hundreds of thousands of people in their circulation areas, but that number has been on a decline. As with us, though, most of them (all of them that are really trying) are seeing big gains on the Web.
Newspapers are not going to disappear anytime soon, but I suspect the newsrooms’ routines will continue to change a lot in the years to come.



